![]() Where do suggested results come from? We have a machine learning model running in the background that makes suggestions on papers. Blue is a referenced result that originates from a different paper. What do the colors mean? Green means the result is approved and shown on the website. A result consists of a metric value, model name, dataset name and task name. What are the colored boxes on the right hand side? These show results extracted from the paper and linked to tables on the left hand side. It shows extracted results on the right hand side that match the taxonomy on Papers With Code. What is this page? This page shows tables extracted from arXiv papers on the left-hand side. Almost all our results are either entirely new or represent significant improvements on previous knowledge. For example, we report the winnability of Klondike as 81.956% +/- 0.096% (in the 'thoughtful' variant where the player knows the location of all cards), a 30-fold reduction in confidence interval over the best previous result. Here we show that a single general purpose Artificial Intelligence program, called "Solvitaire", can be used to determine the winnability percentage of 45 different single-player card games with a 95% confidence interval of +/- 0.1% or better. ![]() A number of different games have been studied empirically in the academic literature and by non-academic enthusiasts. Klondike is just one of many single-player card games, generically called 'patience' or 'solitaire' games, for which players have long wanted to know how likely a particular game is to be winnable. Solitaire klondike deal 1 windows#Our ignorance of the winnability percentage of the game in the Windows Solitaire program, more properly called 'Klondike', has been described as "one of the embarrassments of applied mathematics". ![]() The Winnability of Klondike Solitaire and Many Other Patience Games ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |